Showing posts with label met. Show all posts
Showing posts with label met. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Reviews Roundup: Art and Love in Renaissance Italy at the Met

"The Combat of Love and Chastity" by Gherardo di Giovanni del Fora (Florentine, 1444/45-1497), Probably 1480s, Tempera on panel, The National Gallery of Art, London

Art and Love in Renaissance Italy at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (-Feb. 16)


"...offers continuous bodice-ripping and much evidence that romance has its price. The love-token-heavy show makes upper-crust Italians of the 15th and 16th centuries into libidinous serial divorcers who only courted, married and sired children to get the jewelry, ornamental jugs, commemorative plates, portraits, fertility objects and erotica with which they celebrated weddings, betrothals and birthdays. Full of marvelous gift ideas, especially for the rich and titled, the show’s first two galleries resemble the bridal registry at a Renaissance-era Neiman-Marcus. ... Aside from its appeal to carnal appetites and dangerous liaisons, this show, on the whole, is more chaste than lewd. Leaning heavily toward the scholarly and the saintly, it’s mostly prim and distant, disheveled rather than defiled. ... A show about fertility and romance should be more than mildly interesting or simply appreciative of the craft involved in it. Love is complicated and messy, while 'Art and Love' is just too neat." -Linda Yablonsky/Bloomberg

"It promises romance, desire, youthful beauty, ritual, expensive gift items and possible sex in the land of Romeo and Juliet. It delivers on all counts. But the exhibition, at the Metropolitan Museum, is not an unbroken string of masterpieces. It has its ups and downs, both visual and emotional. It mixes happy endings and cautionary tales and, toward its finish, throws in some Renaissance pornography. ... The works here reveal the ease with which Christian and neo-classical motifs mingled in secular arts during the Renaissance; the centrality of painting as both record and decoration; and the extent to which weddings were big business for artists who found themselves between religious commissions." -Roberta Smith/NYTimes

"The exhibition delved into the esoterica of 500-year-old wedding rites just as the issue of marriage itself surged into the news, with demonstrations and counter-protests all across America. ... While poets sang amorous lyrics and artists conjured sentimental scenes, real unions were governed by dowry negotiations and strategic alliances. The proof of a marriage's success was not happiness but heirs, whose status and destiny were mapped out years before their birth. ... The Met never mentions gay marriage, of course; the Renaissance would have found a same-sex ceremony preposterous. But the implications of all the deluxe paraphernalia is clear: that to consider marriage as a fixed and timeless practice is to miss its history of adapting to society's inconstant needs. At the same time, by documenting the rights and privileges that marriage can confer - the degree to which it binds people to the social order - the show explains why the current debate simply cannot be willed away." -Ariella Budick/FT

"It's in the decorative and printed arts that this exhibit surprises, coming alive with a gossipy, almost Boccaccio-like love of the commonplace." -Dan Bischoff/Star-Ledger

"For the second time this year, the Metropolitan Museum of Art has felt it necessary to advise visitors to exercise parental discretion. Over the summer, a Courbet retrospective featured at least two works as pornographic as anything on the Internet." -James Gardner/WSJ

The exhibit's official site is here. In addition, the Met has no fewer that 19 videos on the exhibit, including an excellent talk by curator Andrea Bayer. Finally, blog posts by Radiocain, lowercaseletter and The Met Everyday.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Eggleston (and Six Others)

William Eggleston, "Untitled," c. 1975

William Eggleston: Democratic Camera, Photographs and Video, 1961-2008 at the Whitney Museum of American Art (-Jan. 25)

Whether he's shooting landscape, portraits or still lives, the photos of Memphis-born William Eggleston have a sense of place, and are often labeled with the city they were taken -- "Untitled New Orleans," "Untitled Nashville," etc. He visited New York, meeting contemporaries like Lee Friedlander and Gary Winogrand, but unlike them he never shot the streets. His is a rural roadside milieu. Born into wealth, he has carried himself like a dandy, affecting capes, driving cars like a Ferrari and a Rolls Royce. In the 70s, he embarked on long road trips, sometimes joined by Dennis Hopper, drinking and shooting photos as they went.

There is a bit of, for lack of a better word, slumming going on: His subjects are mundane in the American vernacular -- drive-ins, grocery stores, strip malls, living rooms. The shots have the casual intimacy of the snapshot, yet there is always something alien or off. He is drawn towards messiness and decay -- exemplified by an early black & white image of a car with one working headlight.

His eye -- and that of his editors (he never culls his own images) -- is drawn toward the freakish in the familiar: the empty stare of the scruffy tie-dye-wearing man sitting in the backseat of a car with a license plate beside him; the old man wearing a suit, sitting on a bed loosely holding a pistol; and the naked man on a sofa, gun rack on the wall. These made me think of Thoreaux's "lives of quiet desperation."

The moments Eggleston captures can be tacky, but without being camp of judgmental: an old woman sitting on a sofa in her untended backyard, her bold dress clashing with bold patterned sofa; the big man with a greased pompadour playing pinball; a young woman wearing a puppy dog t-shirt straddles a fire hydrant, her face contorted, apparently in some kind of religious ecstasy.

This sense of heightened reality also comes from the juxtaposition of bleak scenes with bold color. He was one of the first art photographers to use a dye-transfer printing -- an expensive process theretofore mainly used in advertising that could selectively intensify colors to eye-searing results. This can especially be seen in still lives like a blood red ceiling crisscrossed with a tangle of white electric cords, an open oven door in sickly metallic green and a half-empty bottle of cherry pop on the hood of a car (the latter, a perfect 20th Century American take on the classic still life arrangement).

Eggleston's last major showing in New York, his 1976 debut at the MoMA, launched his career, and kicked opened the door for color photography as serious art -- despite the show getting panned.

In the mid-70s, he experimented with video, modifying a Sony Portapak with infrared tube and documenting the colorful demimonde he encountered in Memphis and on the road. An edited version of this footage called "Stranded in Canton" is included in the retrospective, nicely presented on four CRT monitors paired with stools. There is much drinking, culminating in one scene where a man bites the head off a live chicken. While the video experiments were short-lived, Eggleston's aesthetic has been influential to filmmakers like David Lynch, David Byrne ("True Stories"), Gus Van Sant and Sofia Coppola.

Since the 1980s, Eggleston has been shooting fewer people. The bad news is that his newer work, all tightly-cropped still lives, is suffocating and charmless. The good news is that everything else is sings. At his height, Eggleston had a unique ability to capture the uncanny in the ordinary.


Giorgio Morandi, 1890-1964 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (-Dec. 14)

Giorgio Morandi is thought by many to be the greatest Italian painter of the 20th Century. This is a bit odd considering Morandi's known for contemplative still lives. Brash like Picasso or Pollack, he wasn’t -- on canvas or in his life. Born in Bologna, the shy artist lived with his two sisters for most of his life, rarely traveling outside the city. His style emerged through a friendship with Giorgio de Chirico, and Morandi's early paintings share the metaphysical artist’s proto-surrealist style, down to the bare mannequins. The exhilarating Met survey includes several lovely Cézanne-influenced landscapes and a couple of early self-portraits, but the main attraction is his renderings of objects on a table. He did some traditional arrangements of roses, shells and such, but Morandi's breakthrough idea was fashioning semi-abstracted forms -- bottle, box and cylinder -- painted-over Platonic objects that he grouped as models in his studio and painted. The results often have the deliberately imperfect look of Japanese wabi-sabi ceramics with wavy outlines. The palate is muted, mostly limited to grays and browns. This flattens the image. There is just enough tonal variation and highlights to keep the illusion of three dimensionality and volume. The paintings must be seen in person -- reproductions just don't do them justice. Morandi followed this formula for decades, creating a monomaniacal fugue of still lives. The variations evolved towards abstraction until his final paintings look like Rothkos (although his true artistic beneficiary is Wayne Thiebaud).


theanyspacewhatever at the Guggenheim Museum (-Jan. 7)

Relational aesthetics seems like a good idea -- an arts movement about tweaking the relationship between artist and viewer and even rethinking places like museums, galleries, biennials, etc. Rirkrit Tiravanija was one of its original instigators, best known for cooking meals for gallery goers. Now he's one of 10 artist-friend-collaborators in what is the Gugg's confoundedly awful "anyspacewhatever" show. His main contribution? An Illy-branded coffee stand that resides somewhere near the top of the spiral. The caffeine does little to overcome all the half-baked tackiness. The most memorable object is a rotating bed, which could be reserved at luxe hotel rates for overnights at the museum (a couple critics, including Jerry Saltz, took the bait). Most representative, however, is a tedious video of Tiravanija and his friends, including a few other art luminaries such as Elizabeth Peyton, as they hang out and shoot the shit. Did I metion you have to remove you shoes and sit on pillows to watch? Whatever is right.


The Philippe de Montebello Years: Curators Celebrate Three Decades of Acquisitions at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (-Feb. 1)

The Met’s farewell to Philippe de Montebello is a microcosm of the museum itself, stuffed with exquisite objects of the most diverse kind. Celebrating the treasures acquired during the museum director's 31-year tenure, the show features remarkable juxtapositions. For instance, Baroque statuary with a Francis Bacon, a Balthus lolita with Guercino's "Sampson Captured by the Philistines," or 15th Century playing cards and a Rothko. The show also reveals visitors' own favorites. With some guilt, I skimmed over much of the non-European objects, although there are amazing examples from the Americas, Asia, Africa and on. My overall favorites were Thomas P. Anshutz's handsome 1907 John Singer Sargent-style oil portrait "A Rose," and Joachim Wtewael's fleshy dayglow "The Golden Age" (see image at left) and Rubens' oil of the painter with his wife and child -- one of de Montibello's favorites. While remarkably inclusive, the show also reveals some gaps in the museum’s collection, particularly the scarcity of any art other than photos from the last 50 years, the Bacon excepted. Thinking about this show, I'm reminded of all the times I've visited the museum, beginning sometime in the mid-70s. While I've never met the man, I have to wonder, how much as my taste been influenced by Philippe de Montebello?


Catherine Opie: American Photographer at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (-Jan. 7)

I had always thought of Catherine Opie as a lesbian Mapplethorpe who documents and celebrates the gay, transgender and s&m cultures. One of her best known works is a self-portrait with the word “pervert” carved raw into her chest. But as this seductive retrospective at the Guggenheim shows, she is so much more. Even her most sexually provocative images exude a warmth and vitality missing in Mapplethrope’s brutal black and white formalism. This difference becomes more pronounced in her newer work. Adjacent to the “pervert” photo, is a more recent matching shot of Opie breastfeeding her son. The scar from the self-inflicted wound can still be seen, but the focus is motherhood and domesticity. Her photos documents her family life -- such as with one of her son in a pink tutu (see image at right) -- and other lesbian households with and without kids. My favorite series in her diverse body of work are landscapes that have nothing to do with sexual preference -- such as black & whites of lovely curving highway overpasses and on-ramps. Best of all are her recent images of surfers and ice fishing shacks. Brilliantly installed on opposite walls, the images illustrate how communities pull individuals together.


New York, N. Why?: Photographs by Rudy Burckhardt, 1937–1940 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (-Jan. 4)

In 1940, Swiss photographer Rudy Burckhardt and his pal, poet Edwin Denby collaborated on a book celebrating the city where they lived -- New York. The work was created on aimless walks, which they sometimes took with their Chelsea neighbor Willem de Kooning. I didn’t have much patience for Denby’s poetry or for Burckhardt’s dogs-eye-view photos of pedestrian legs, fire hydrants and so on.


George Tooker: A Retrospective at the National Academy Museum (-Jan. 4)

George Tooker was trained at the Art Student’s League by social realist Reginald Marsh, where he developed a style known as American Magical Realism. Taking the psychologically tinted real-life representations of Andrew Wyeth and Edward Hopper, he adds a hallucinogenic and cartoonish quality that is heightened by bright colors of egg tempera painting method of Piero della Francesca. Tooker's work of the 50s and 60s has an element of social critique, taking on broad subjects like alienation. One of his more famous works, which is owned by the Whitney, portrays the fear of a woman on her own in a subway station. Another conveys the bureaucratic oppression of waiting in line for what might be the DMV. A third, a menacing grid of office cubicles with no way out. Tooker's art also increasingly takes on non-political themes. A 1940s painting depicts a group of young men and women under a Coney Island boardwalk that references traditional imagery of Christ's crucifixion (see image at right). Tooker also made paintings of his Puerto Rican and African-American neighbors -- mainly homoerotic images of shirtless men in their windows. While there's nothing earth-shattering about this work, there is something refreshing about his allegiance to representation, like a gay Norman Rockwell.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Blockbusters and Fashionistas

Haute couture by Gareth Pugh

Superheroes: Fashion and Fantasy at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (-Sept. 1)

The latest and most improbable step in the mainstreaming of comic books, "Superheroes: Fashion and Fantasy" at the Met takes a look at the commonalities between costumed characters and haute couture from the runway fashion, and what they say (or don't say) about our bodies and ourselves. The small and shallow exhibit matches wardrobes from TV and the movies with an assortment of recent designer frockery in several ponderous groupings.

"Graphic Body" pairs Christopher Reeve's 1977 Superman suit with a Moschino homage that substitutes an "M" for the famous "S," and Tobey McGuire's Spiderman with a web-themed gothy getup by exhibition-sponsor Georgio Armani. "Patriotic Body" puts Lynda Carter's Wonder Woman alongside a Dior ensemble with a headpiece made of Coke cans. The "Paradoxical Body" has Michelle Pfeiffer's black latex Catwoman suit alongside very similar looking dominatrix-inspired numbers by designers including Versace and Dolce Gambana. "Armored Body" features Christian Bale's Dark Knight and Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man -- suspiciously well-timed for the films' summer release -- together with a sexy take on Fritz Lang's Metropolis by Thierry Muggler, police-inspired uniforms by Armani and a stunning angular black angel of death by Gareth Pugh (see above). "Mutant Body" predictably matches Rebecca Romijn's Mystique from the X-Men, with a feathery mermaid fantasy from Thierry Muggler (see below). "Aerodynamic Body" doesn't have a superhero costume, but it does have -- Olympic tie-in! -- Michael Phelp's Speedo.

The movie costumes come off as dingy, faded and smaller than you remember them. The high-fashion too suffers from lifeless mannequin displays -- why no photos or video? But overall, if we were to imagine some epic face-off between the forces of fashion and the superfriends, we'd definitely give the edge to the frockists. That said, while there are some inspired fashions from the 1990s to the present on display -- especially those by Mr. Muggler -- it's a rather thin historic slice.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Sexy Frenchies

"The Arcadian Shepherds (aka Et in Arcadia Ego)" by
Nicolas Poussin (photo courtesy the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Poussin and Nature: Arcadian Visions

Metropolitan Museum of Art
Feb. 12 – May 11, 2008

Gustave Courbet

Metropolitan Museum of Art
Feb. 27– May 18, 2008

I’ve got your Whitney Biennial hangover cure: some good old-fashioned sexy French oils.

Numero uno is Nicolas Poussin, perhaps the first great French painter and originator of the Neoclassical style.

While it purports to focus on the artist’s use of landscape, the show is a nice chronology of the artist’s development.

In my view, Poussin's most stunning paintings were done early in his career, when he lived in Rome where he soaked in the Renaissance love affair with Greek and Roman mythology, painting small, sensuous canvasses under the influence of Titian.

In “Landscape with a River God; Venus and Adonis” (1626) the unclothed god and goddess embrace with ardor amidst a sun-soaked idyllic landscape as putti play under a tree and a river god salves the thirst of a greyhound. The stunning painting was cut in half some two hundred years ago, its pieces reunited for the first time in this show.

Almost Courbet-like in its blatant sensuality is “Sleeping Venus and Cupid” from the same year. A prostrate and naked Venus sleeps, legs akimbo, and long hair hiding her lady parts as two shepherds lasciviously watch from behind some bushes.

My favorite might be “The Arcadian Shepherds (a.k.a. Et in Arcadia Ego),” (see above) which depicts three figures — two young men and a lovely toga-clad woman — in a moment of surprise as they come across a tomb on which sits a skull. Its cryptic inscription reads “et in arcadio ego” — which means something like “I am death even in Arcadia” and may be read as an allegory for loss of innocence. Or, if you’re a reader of the “Da Vinci Code,” it’s proof of a sinister conspiracy of some sort.

The second half of the show features the artist’s decidedly less-sexy mature style – larger canvasses, smoother brush work and more sober and allegorical works. One example is the deeply strange “Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun” (1658). In this work, a blind giant is aided by a man named Cedalion rides on shoulders. One arm outstretched, Orion walks through verdant scenery, seeking the light that will cure his blindness. But hovering above is a blue-skinned Diana, who commands the clouds to cast a shadow. Whatever it means, the painting displays Poussin’s mastery of light and landscape, especially in conveying depth and distance.

As an aside, it’s evident from the show’s catalog that Poussin and his “Blind Orion” painting are favorites of Phillipe de Montebello, the museum’s departing director. Perhaps it says something about the man that he’s drawn towards these notoriously difficult and intellectual works.

The great Cézanne famously said that he strove to “recreate Poussin after nature,” meaning that even when copying nature directly he still thinks of aspires to be as perfect as Poussin. As it happens, Cézanne was also a fan of Gustave Courbet, and is said to have carried a photograph of the artist’s super-sensuous “Women with a Parrot” in his wallet for many years. More on that painting below.

A self-styled Bohemian, Monsieur Courbet made a name for himself thumbing his nose at convention, declaring a new style of “Realism” in opposition to the prevailing Romantic and Neoclassical styles -- rejecting the prevailing Poussin-like mode of mythologizing, dramatizing and historicizing and paving the way for Manet, Cézanne and Picasso.

Arranged thematically and in loose chronology, the Courbet retrospective presents a nice overview with plenty of self-portraits, such as the jaunty “Self-Portrait with Pipe” (1941), adept landscapes, superfluous hunting paintings, a few peasant scenes and several portraits, including a famous 1853 one of his friend, the Anarchist philosopher P.J. Proudhon.

Sadly, due to their monumental size, his two greatest works – “Burial at Ornans” (1849-50) and “The Artist’s Studio” (1855) – are not included in the show and remain in Paris. The lack of the latter painting — a kind of Sergeant Pepper’s portrait of the artist and his friends — is cleverly handled by hinting at it through a patchwork display of single photographs and paintings, such of one Charles Baudelaire. (No, Baudelaire isn’t included in Sgt. Pepper, I checked. Poe yes, Baudelaire non.)

The high point of the show are, of course, the sexy bits.

Young Ladies on the Banks of the Seine” (1856-77) depicts two women laying under a tree. Hot and tired from the summer sun, or perhaps, it’s hinted, some other more erotic exertion. The disheveled woman in the foreground looks distractedly towards us, her features distorted, as if melting. This electric painting points the way towards Manet and Gaugin.

In Cézanne’s favorite painting, “Women with a Parrot” (1866), a naked wild-haired woman is in the midst of a reverie. Head twisted backwards with the hint of a toothy smile, her luminescent white flesh and twisted sheet make her seem to float above the deep, lush landscape where, dream-like, her bed lies. Perched on an outstretched hand is her pet parrot, its colorful wings outstretched. A brilliant flowing composition, the painting presents what might be an allegory of masturbation. (Interestingly, Manet did a much more demure “Woman with a Parrot” the same year.)

Unlike Poussin’s sexually-charged “Sleeping Venus,” Courbet’s nudes dispense with mythologizing veils like that of the Oriental Odalisque used by his contemporary Ingres. Although, certainly “Women with a Parrot” has an otherworldly feel.

For true clinical realism, the show includes Courbet’s notorious crotch-shot, “The Origin of the World” (1866), which was purchased along with a tacky lesbian canvas (“Sleep”) by a Turkish diplomat. A later owner, the French psychoanalyst and theorist Jacques Lacan, displayed “Origin” behind a specially made curtain. While the works retains much of its shock-value after all these years, its brilliant, bluntly poetic title transmutes the work into something far more than pornography.

After taking in both shows, I wandered around the museum’s second floor, coming across three paintings by Poussin and nine (!) by Courbet that remain on display separately. These include two exceptionally lovely works – Poussin’s “The Rest or the Flight to Egypt” (c. 1627) and Courbet’s “Nude with Flowering Branch” (1863). What a testament to the depth of the Met’s collection.